Thursday, 25 September 2014

Pre- reflection: Theme 4

The paper I have chosen is The growth of  TV news, the demise of the journalism profession” which is published under ‘Media Culture and Society’ journal. Five year impact factor is 1.295
Written by Carey L. Higgins-Dobney and Gerald Sussman (2013)

This study shows the critical literature on the transformation of local news ownership structure and the impacts of technological reorganization of news production on the television profession and local communities. This study looks at the underlying political economy on local news production and focuses specifically on the labor conditions of newsroom personnel. For this purpose, this study used some quantitative methods based on surveys.

Which quantitative method or methods are used in the paper? Which are the benefits and limitations of using these methods?
One method used in this study is ‘Collecting the empirical data’, the benefit of this method is that it’s fast and results are able to be confirmed and all the observations are based on evidence. For example, one observation to confirm that what the media industry calls ‘the one-man band’ – journalists who conduct the interview, shoot, edit, and report the story for air and post it to the web. More than 30% of news directors nationally said they mostly used ‘one-man-bands’ to cover the news in 2009, perhaps more telling is that less than one in five said they do not use solo journalists, a drop of 35% from three years earlier. Almost 43% said the use of one-man-bands altered the way stations were willing to hire (Paper, 2011). So through these data, we can easily see that how ‘one-man band’ growing in media industry but on the other hand the number don’t show how and why so I think that this is limitation.
After gathering the data, this paper shows the analysis of data by using table ‘cross-media ownership of Portland’s commercial TV companiesThe benefit of using this method that, the data is structured and organized so it can be proof of results they obtained from surveys. But this method have not used any scientific or logical approach to create table.
 
What did you learn about quantitative methods from reading the paper?
The objective of quantitative research is to develop and employ numerical data, theories or hypothesis pertaining to phenomena by using computational and statistical techniques. The process of measurement is central to quantitative research because it provides the fundamental connection between empirical observation and mathematical expression of quantitative relationships. Such as in this paper they came up with some questions to find best possible answers or to reach to any conclusion. For this purpose, they collected data in numbers by using quantitative approach, so they can compare the results and answer the questions.

Which are the main methodological problems of the study? How could the use of the quantitative method or methods have been improved?
I think as this study used the method of collecting and analyzing the empirical data, this approach is observable, even though you can find some results still it can only show limited results in a specific duration of time. For example, the data were collected in time duration 2002 --- 2009 and paper was published in 2013 so results can be different in current situation. Quantitative methods have undoubtedly contributed to the wider acceptance but it can be fruitful if it is used prescriptively.


“Physical activity, stress, and self-reported upper respiratory tract infection”

Which are the benefits and limitations of using quantitative methods?
The main benefit of quantitative research is that it provides descriptive data —for example, allowing us to capture a snapshot of a user population by using statistical approach and in this way you can study in wider perspective. Also statistical analysis lets us derive important facts from research data, including preference trends, differences between groups and demographics.  It may have higher credibility with many people in power. Quantitative methods are less time consuming, for example you can use software for statistical analysis and mathematical formulas to compute results.    
The limitation is that the descriptive data is problematic when it comes to interpretation, as it can provide a numerical data but cannot provide the crucial information to interpret the data. The researcher might miss out the phenomena occurring because of more focus on testing the hypothesis rather than on theory. One limitation is that the knowledge produced might be too abstract and general as data obtained from local situation, contexts and individuals.

Which are the benefits and limitations of using qualitative methods?
The great benefit of qualitative research that it can provide you details about human behavior, thoughts and personality characteristics that quantitative studies cannot match. Qualitative data provides a rich, detailed picture to be built up about why people act in certain ways, and their feelings about these actions. 
The limitation of qualitative method is that the researcher collects data about the specific group of participants so you cannot necessarily use this data to make assumptions. Also its time consuming and this study is not so easy.



No comments:

Post a Comment